Profit Colleges "Why do you think they are called for-profit colleges: Few adults have the ability to afford a traditional four-year school and balance the needs of home and work. Online, for-profit colleges or nighttime schools may seem the ideal solution. On the surface, it may very well seem that "for-profits exist in large part to fix educational market failures left by traditional institutions, and they profit by serving students that public and private nonprofit institutions too often ignore" Carey
Traditionally, College degrees are awarded by the many State and Community colleges that provide accredited and time-tested programs. Yet, due to the rising population of the US, many of these institutions only have so much capacity for new students.
As a result, many disadvantaged applicants are unable to obtain a seat in any of these traditional colleges due to the increasingly competitive nature of college admittance, leaving them without the opportunity to obtain a college degree.
As a result, a gap in the free-market appeared, allowing a new breed of college to spring up all over the country to service those who cannot get into these traditional colleges.
With campuses spread along freeways in accessible locations and a plethora of online classes, these new colleges seem to be an amazing opportunity to those denied a traditional college experience.
However, these For-Profits have found themselves wrapped up in controversy with allegations of overcharging their mostly disadvantaged and minority students, in the process of relying heavily on the Federal Student Loans program. In the midst of this whorl of criticism and controversy, policy writer Kevin Carey of Education Sector, a non-partisan think tank, provides his own position on the allegations against these For-Profit Universities.
In this paper, I will analyze the techniques Carey utilizes to pursue his argument through the course of his main claims, to argue that Carey utilizes the problems and benefits of the For-Profit Industry as stepping stones to address the problems that traditional education are not adequately responding too.
In order to create a convincing claim in this regard, Carey relies on statistics and personal opinion which he scores with personal anecdotes regarding his interviews with For-Profit Financier Michael Clifford.
In one section regarding the high-rates of tuition and correlating loan default rates, Carey states: As a rule, For-Profits charge much more than public colleges and universities.
Many of their students come from moderate- and low-income backgrounds. All this government funding is notable because enrolling at for-profit colleges turns out to be a terrible deal for most students.
Almost three fifths drop out without a degree within a year, and virtually all take on debt to help pay for their education. They default on their loans at about twice the rate of students at public colleges and universities and three times the rate of students at private ones.
Those who graduate often wind up in low-paying jobs, doing tasks with minimal connection to their degrees. Who was more focused on the public interest? Carey further supports his point by referencing Kaplan colleges plan to partner with the community college system to provide classes that the community colleges could not provide themselves.
Pain is the greater motivator in the short term.
Carey, 55 While the senate report does not specifically mention the physical expansion of For-Profit colleges, it does address the recruitment principles used by these Universities. By first providing a framework through the problems inherent in the For-Profit system, then swiftly changing the direction of his argument, Carey leads into a radically different source of the problems plaguing Higher-Education in America than what initially would have been blamed on the For-Profits.
By refusing an opportunity to better service more students through the assistance of Kaplan, Carey sees negligence on the side of the community college, who should be utilizing the innovations of the For-Profits to service more students.
As retiring For-Profit faculty member Michael Seiden states: Finally, because the for-profit institutions are in competition with public universities and community colleges that charge lower tuition, they must offer students something more. Ironically, this failure in turn, leads to more students being unable to obtain a college degree, possibly driving them into the waiting arms of the For-Profits.
To start his argument, he leads in with the absolute worst information about the For-Profits financial practices. To me this seems to be a strategy to bring in his more traditionally minded readers. By starting with the worst information, he can then transition out to the benefits of the For-Profits, ending on a more positive note.
However, those problems are not the focus of his article, rather they are an introduction to the problems in the Non-Profit sector. Evidence of this is found, in that after tearing down the For-Profits, Carey abruptly reminds the reader of the benefits that the For-Profits provide rather than continuing to target problems within the For-Profit Industry.
Carey then proceeds to criticize the Traditional colleges for problems with accreditation, and other glaring errors that have made rise to the For-Profits.
While some of the claims Carey uses could be benefited by additional evidence, his impartiality in criticizing both sides of this debate allows for a strong overall argument on the highly controversial For-Profit Industry. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 29 June The price you pay and the degree you earn doesn’t always get you what you want.
By researching multiple arguments, I hope to give a better understanding . Jul 25, · The for-profit Kaplan University recently struck a deal with the California community-college system to provide courses that the bankrupt public colleges regardbouddhiste.com: Kevin Carey.
Oct 20, · In his article, “Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges?” in the educator focused Chronicle of Higher Education, Carey sets out to find the truth on the For-Profit Industry, while also taking a differing stance to the traditional viewpoints that For-Profits are useless institutions.
In this paper, I will analyze the. Excerpt from Term Paper: Profit Colleges "Why do you think they are called for-profit colleges:" The big business of (not) educating students 'You need a college degree.' This is the conventional wisdom articulated in today's society, where job prospects remain scarce, despite the softening economy.
Iscuss the points brought up by the writers, and what do you think is the propose for writing these articles? The purpose of the essay is to demonstrate your understanding of the larger conversation and your ambitious critical thinking on the ideas presented in the range of readings.
But many for-profit institutions have regional accreditation, too. That's what people like Clifford are buying when they invest in troubled colleges.