During the late Presidential Jubilee many persons Have met at festive boards, in pleasant conversation, Centinel, July 12,introducing the term "Era of Good Feelings"  The Era of Good Feelings started in in the mood of victory that swept the nation at the end of the War of The political hostilities declined because the Federalist Party had largely dissolved after the fiasco of the Hartford Convention in — Calhoun and Henry Clay 's American System. Both parties exhorted him to include a Federalist in his cabinet to symbolize the new era of "oneness" that pervaded the nation.
Through necessity American domestic industries had grown and diversified significantly, especially cotton and woolen textiles, and iron production.
The frontier remained a flashpoint for international strife. In a move to recapture American markets, Great Britain proceeded to systematically flood the US markets with superior manufactured items at cut-rate prices, the aim of which was to drive American manufacturers out of business.
The strict constructionist ideologists of the dominant Jeffersonian Republican Party — though averse to concentrating power into the hands of the federal government — recognized the expediency of nationalizing certain institutions and projects as a means of achieving national growth and economic security.
Dallas presented a federal budget report to Congress projecting a substantial government deficit by the end of Though his budget figures were not in dispute, the means of raising the funds were, and proposals for direct or excise taxes were generally unpopular.
His proposal provoked opposition from two economic sectors: The North, however, was increasingly industrial, with 20 percent of its workforce engaged in manufacturing, compared to 8 percent in the South. Southerner planters, committed to a pastoral slave-based culture and economy, were net consumers of manufactured goods — goods which would cost more under a tariff regime.
The South expressed hostility to the measure throughout the debates, but a substantial number ultimately were compelled to consider its protective advantages. The tariff was also popular in the Kentucky, among those who hoped to develop new textile industries weaving locally grown hemp.
Acknowledging the need to provide sufficient government funding, and with no adequate alternative propositions, the South felt compelled to consider protection.
Southern support of the tariff was not demonstrably linked to any significant trend towards industry in the South, or to the existence of textile mills in the Congressional districts of Southern representatives.
The Southern patriots — War Hawks  — had been some of the most strident foes of British aggression and fierce champions of the national government. Hanson of Maryland all supporting the tariff as a war measure.
In that event, a healthy US manufacturing base — including war industries — would be vital to the survival of the American republic. Calhoun of South Carolina called for national unity through interdependence of trade, agriculture and manufacturing.
First, the tariff was understood to be a temporary expedient to deal with clear and present dangers. The duties would be lowered in three years June by which time the strife would likely have subsided.
Third, economic prosperity prevailed in the agrarian South at the time of the debates, easing concerns about the financial burdens imposed by the tariff. Most of the economic benefits would accrue to the North and the West — in the national interest.
Finally, Republicans, emerging from the War ofwith the opposition Federalist Party in disgrace, felt sufficiently in control of the political landscape to permit an experiment in centralizing policies. A duty of thirty percent was placed on iron, leather, hats, writing paper and cabinet ware, as well as three cents on a pound of sugar.
This was the only overtly protective feature of the legislation, and served to exclude these foreign textiles altogether from US markets.
Both parties were divided, with Republicans voting nationwide 63 yeas to 31 nays, and the Federalists voting 25 yeas to 23 nays.Loved these videos. Professor is great at combining the grammar lectures with history, research, stories about her students, stories about people in her profession, stories about her personal life including a funny story of how her mom was very strict with grammar, etc.
Strict vs. Loose Construction (Interpretation) Hamilton represented the Federalists The Federalists supported a strong national government Jefferson represented the Democratic-Republicans The Democratic-Republicans wanted more state power, less national government power Democratic-Republicans were.
A strict constructionist attempts to interpret the law based on the words of the law itself, while a loose constructionist applies a more liberal reading to the text.
The debate between strict and loose construction of the United States Constitution has been a feature of . Loose constructionist definition is - an advocate of loose construction (as of a statute or constitution); specifically: one favoring a liberal construction of the Constitution of the U.S.
to give broader powers to the federal government. The Tariff of (also known as the Dallas tariff) is notable as the first tariff passed by Congress with an explicit function of protecting U.S.
manufactured items from overseas competition.
Prior to the War of , tariffs had primarily served to raise revenues to operate the national regardbouddhiste.comr unique aspect of the tariff was the strong support it received from Northern states.
Obviously, African countries have a problem with child sacrifice if the governments have to make posters like the one below. The rituals of African tribal religions many times involve the use of the blood of animals, and even human sacrifice, and there have even been documented instances of cannibalism.